no motorboat lakes near me

No Motor? No Worries! Activities for Waterways with Boat Restrictions

If you’re interested in lakefront property for sale , don’t let the idea of purchasing Adirondack waterfront land with boat restrictions scare you off. There are many benefits to living on a motor-free lake and it doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy a day on the water! There are tons of non-motorboat options to choose from:

If you’re looking for a way to get out and enjoy the water, kayaking is a great activity that can be done alone or with friends and family! You don’t need any prior experience to try this fun hobby, but it can also be a challenge if you’re looking for something more athletic.

For those who are new to kayaking, there are several options available to get started. You can take lessons from an experienced instructor or simply rent equipment at your local recreational center – in either case, it’s an easy way to learn the ropes without investing in expensive gear just yet! If you’d prefer not to take lessons (or if they aren’t offered) then just try it on your own – it’s easier than you might think! Kayaks are very stable boats that can handle rough waters well. You’ll quickly gain confidence as soon as you get out into open water so don’t worry too much; instead, focus on enjoying yourself!

The best part about kayaking is that anyone can do it: kids as young as eight years old have been known to paddle alongside adults without difficulties and seniors often use them because they are a low-impact sport that doesn’t strain joints as other activities would. There’s no age limit when you’re having fun on the water!

Stand-Up Paddleboarding

Stand-up paddleboarding (SUP) is one of the most popular water sports in the world, and it’s easy to see why. It’s a great workout for your core and balance, and unlike motorboats, SUPs don’t disturb any animals or humans in the water with noise pollution. You can even do yoga or fish while standing up on your board!

Paddling can be done almost anywhere: Adirondack lakes are common places for recreational SUP enthusiasts and whitewater paddlers alike, but rivers, oceans, and even swamps are also functional when searching for new adventures. The main thing to consider when choosing a location is whether there will be enough water depth once you walk out from shore or wade in from the shallows.

Depending on your level of experience and commitment, there are different types of boards that may be better suited for your needs:

• Inflatable: As its name suggests, an inflatable SUP can be pumped full of air so that it’s ready for use right away when you get out on the lake or ocean. This type is typically more expensive than traditional boards, but is more convenient and can easily deflate and be taken from place to place!
• Hardshell: A hardshell board is usually made from fiberglass or plastic foam; these materials provide good stability but also make them more difficult to transport if you want to go paddling somewhere besides your local lake. They’re less expensive than inflatables but require more maintenance than other types due to their construction materials getting easily damaged by sunlight and saltwater exposure over time.
• Surfboard: Truthfully, you could surf on any SUP, but these are specifically designed to perform well on waves. These boards look like regular surfboards except they don’t have fins attached underneath them—instead, they’re just smooth so they can slide across any surface without being caught up in anything else floating around nearby (like seaweed). 

Give it a try! Many tourist shops now offer paddleboard rentals for those who want to try them before making an investment. Many places also offer classes where seasoned instructors will teach you how to SUP safely while having fun out on the water.

Canoes make for a fun day trip or overnight adventure, it’s no wonder they’re the most popular boat in the Adirondack Park! If you’re unsure of where to begin with canoeing, sign up for one of the many guided trips offered by local outfitters and guides. You’ll have an easy time finding a place that rents canoes near you—they are available at businesses all over Upstate New York!

Many people like canoes because they allow you to get closer to nature than motorized boats do as they move more slowly and quietly through the water (though speed demons will most likely prefer sailboats). Canoes can easily hold one or two people so you can decide if you want to paddle alone or with a partner.

Plus, it’s much easier to get out on the lake since canoes don’t require gas or filling stations as motorboats do; usually, all that’s needed is an oar and a life jacket!

Sailing is a popular water sport and for good reason. It’s a great way to get outside and enjoy the breeze on your face as you sail through the water. Since a sailboat is propelled by the wind, it is a great way to enjoy a lake that doesn’t allow motorboats. Sailing is relatively easy once you have some experience and get used to it, so if you haven’t tried it yet and are looking for something new to do on your lake this summer, consider giving sailing a go!

If you don’t know how to sail and want to learn, it’s helpful to take lessons from an instructor who can help teach and guide you through the process. Because there are so many different little things that go into sailing, having an experienced person help show you what exactly goes into doing it will make learning much easier. 

Rowboats are the perfect option for folks looking to enjoy a slower pace on the lake, and one of the most versatile. Not only can they be used for exploration and birdwatching , but they’re also an excellent way to get some exercise while you’re out there. Take advantage of their flat bottoms to pull up on a beach or a rock and have yourself a picnic—many lakeside parks will provide picnic areas complete with tables, grills, and other amenities.

If you’re looking for a family-friendly way to enjoy the water, try a pedal boat—it’s a fun and easy experience that can be enjoyed by almost anyone. You can usually reserve them at any given marina, or if you have access to your own boat dock, there are plenty of rental companies out there that will deliver them to you!

A pedal boat is essentially an enclosed paddleboat powered by pedals instead of paddles. The use of pedals means that the entire family can participate in propelling the boat through the water. It’s a great way to get everyone involved! So gather up your crew, put on some sunscreen, and hop aboard; from there, it’s smooth sailing all day long.

Buying Adirondack Land with Boating Restrictions

Though lake restrictions can sometimes seem onerous, motor-free lakes are great for the local community, property value, and above all else, the natural environment, helping with Adirondack land and habitat preservation. 

Enjoy endless recreation opportunities with our lakefront property for sale . Our buildable lots are perfect for nature enthusiasts looking to enjoy the serenity of nature and get out on calm waters. Contact us today to get started.

Boating - non-motorized

Find events for this activity

Find facilities with this activity.

• Jun 5, 2023

5 Non-Motorized, Lake Minocqua Watersports to Try this Summer

Lake Minocqua is a beautiful destination that offers a wide range of exciting watersports for people of all ages and skill levels. With its mostly-clear waters, lush green surroundings, and warm summer sun, it's no surprise that visitors flock to the area to enjoy its numerous recreational activities.

While many of the guests at Nitschke’s Northern Resort LOVE taking their boats out on the Minocqua chain-of-lakes (especially because a boat slip is included with every cabin rental), we thought it’d be fun to share 5 non-motorized ways to enjoy the waters this summer.

So, book your cabin , grab a swimsuit, pack a towel, and get ready to dive into aquatic adventures that await you at Nitschke’s Northern Resort!

Stand-up Paddleboarding (SUP) - A Relaxing Way to Explore

Stand-up paddleboarding, or SUP, has become increasingly popular in recent years. This exciting watersport allows you to stand on a large, stable board and use a long paddle to propel yourself through the water. SUP is not only a great way to explore the beautiful lake and its surroundings but also an excellent workout for your core and upper body.

The calm waters of Lake Minocqua make it an ideal location for beginners to learn the basics of SUP. Once you have mastered your balance and paddle technique, you can venture out further into the lake to explore its many coves and inlets. If you're feeling adventurous, you can even try SUP yoga, which combines the serenity of yoga with the gentle movements of paddleboarding.

Kayaking - An Adventure for All Skill Levels

Kayaking is another popular watersport on Lake Minocqua that doesn't require a motor. This activity involves sitting in a small, lightweight boat called a kayak and using a double-bladed paddle to propel yourself through the water. Kayaking offers an excellent opportunity to explore the lake and its surrounding areas at your own pace, providing a unique perspective of the landscape.

Lake Minocqua has numerous kayaking routes to choose from, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced paddlers. Beginners can start by navigating through the calm, protected bays and inlets, while experienced kayakers can venture out into the open waters or travel through the chain-of-lakes, for a more challenging adventure.

Regardless of your skill level, kayaking is a fantastic way to enjoy the beauty of Lake Minocqua and take in the breathtaking views of the surrounding forests and wildlife.

Canoeing - Timeless Enjoyment for All Ages

Canoeing is a timeless water sport that has been enjoyed by generations and cultures of people around the world. Similar to kayaking, canoeing involves paddling a small, lightweight boat through the water. However, canoes are typically larger than kayaks and can accommodate more passengers, making them an excellent choice for families or groups of friends.

Lake Minocqua offers a variety of canoeing routes that cater to all skill levels. Beginners can start by exploring the calm, shallow waters near the shoreline, while more experienced paddlers can venture out into the open waters where the occasional boater making waves could make it an exciting adventure.

Canoeing is not only a fun and relaxing way to experience the beauty of Lake Minocqua but also offers an opportunity to bond with your loved ones as you paddle together in harmony. If you don’t, you’ll be going in circles!

Paddle Boating - Using Your Feet to Propel You Forward

Paddle boating is a unique water sport that offers a fun (and typically more dry) way to explore Lake Minocqua without the need for a motor. Paddle boats are small, lightweight vessels that are powered by pedaling with your feet, similar to riding a bicycle. This low-impact activity is suitable for people of all ages and fitness levels, making it an excellent choice for families or groups of friends.

Paddle boating is a fantastic way to spend a leisurely afternoon on the lake, as it allows you to take in the stunning scenery while gently gliding through the water. You can choose to paddle along the shoreline, explore the many coves and inlets, or simply relax on the calm waters while enjoying a picnic or sunbathing on your boat depending on its size.

Snorkeling - Discovering Underwater Wonders

Snorkeling is an exciting water sport that allows you to explore the underwater world of Lake Minocqua without the need for any complicated equipment or training. All you need is a mask, snorkel, and fins, and you're ready to dive into the mostly-clear waters to discover a fascinating world teeming with life.

The lake is home to a diverse array of fish species, as well as other aquatic creatures such as turtles and crayfish. Snorkeling offers an excellent opportunity to get up close and personal with these amazing creatures, as well as explore the unique underwater landscape of the lake. Whether you're an experienced snorkeler or a complete beginner, the calm waters of Lake Minocqua provide the perfect environment for a memorable underwater adventure.

Tips for Staying Safe While Enjoying Watersports

While watersports are a fun and exciting way to enjoy the beauty of Lake Minocqua, it's essential to prioritize safety while participating in these activities. Here are some tips to help you stay safe while enjoying your favorite watersports:

Always wear a life jacket or personal flotation device (PFD) while participating in watersports, regardless of your swimming ability.

Be aware of the weather conditions and avoid venturing out on the water if storms or high winds are forecasted.

Familiarize yourself with the lake's rules and regulations, and always follow them.

Paddle or swim with a buddy, especially if you're new to the sport or exploring unfamiliar areas.

Carry a whistle or other signaling device to alert others if you need assistance.

Stay hydrated and protect yourself from the sun by wearing a hat, sunglasses, and sunscreen.

Dive into Summer Fun at Nitschke's Northern Resort on Lake Minocqua

Lake Minocqua offers a wide range of thrilling watersports that don't require a motor, making it the perfect destination for a fun and exciting summer vacation.

From stand-up paddleboarding and kayaking to canoeing, paddle boating, and snorkeling, there's something for everyone at this beautiful lake.

By following the safety tips outlined in this article, you can ensure that your watersports adventures are not only enjoyable but also safe for you and your loved ones.

Ready to try these amazing watersports? Book a cabin with Nitschke's Northern Resort and get ready for fun in the sun!

Recent Posts

Exploring the Local Flavors: Best Summer Dining Experiences Near Lake Minocqua

Top 10 Summer Activities on Lake Minocqua: A Week of Adventure Awaits

Family-Friendly Lakeside Resorts in Minocqua for Unforgettable Vacations

Lake Homes Realty Articles and Info – LakeHomes.com

Lake Life in the Slow Lane: Non-Motorized Watercrafts

In 2021, most boats that you’ll see on the lake are motorized. The typical propulsion system for boats, outbound motors are a self-contained unit affixed to the back of the boat which contains an engine, gearbox, and propeller. Essentially, these contraptions take fuel and convert it to power so your boat moves forward. Some motors are inbound rather than outbound, meaning that the engine is inside the boat’s hull. 

While motors are a useful, modern invention for boats, they aren’t always necessary. In fact, there are several joys and benefits of forgoing the motor for paddles, oars, and other manual propellers. If you love being on the water, but you enjoy a slower pace of lake living, one of these non-motorized watercrafts might be perfect for you.

The technology of sailboats is as old as recorded history. Our earliest record of sailboats is from Ancient Egypt when the Nile River and the Mediterranean were used as popular trade routes among various lands. Without the technology of a motor, sailboats simply use the natural wind to propel the boat forward. Because wind is unpredictable, any seasoned sailor knows how to adjust the sails to the wind — a concept that lends itself metaphorically to life. Although the terminology can be complicated, once you learn the tricks of the trade, it’s worth it. 

Similar to the sailboat, the canoe’s history dates back thousands of years. Rather than being specific to one country and culture, canoes were likely ubiquitous across the world and instrumental in trade, war, and personal transportation. The English word comes from a Caribbean word meaning “dugout.” This name appropriately reflects the practice of constructing a boat from a tree and carving a hollowed space for sitting. Instead of a motor, typically, canoers use paddles to propel the boat forward. In a two-person canoe, the front paddler controls the speed and power while the back paddler controls the direction.

Unlike canoes that have an unspecified origin, kayaks likely originated in northern parts of the world such as present-day Greenland, Siberia, and North America. Meaning “ small boat of skins ” in the Greenland Eskimo language, these non-motorized watercrafts were first used by Inuit and Aleut people for travel and trading. While these first kayaks were created out of bone, wood, and animal skin, today’s kayaks are mostly made from long-lasting polyethylene plastics. Because kayaks are usually operated by one person, the kayaker will use a double-sided paddle to propel the small boat forward. 

Standup Paddleboards

Most personal watercrafts involve sitting in , not on the watercraft. Not so with SUPs. An acronym for “stand up paddleboard,” SUPs have roots in surfing. The modern sport originated in Waikiki, Hawaii in the 1940s by John Ah Choy , a surfer who as he aged, wasn’t able to get up and down from his surfboard like he could in his younger days. For aid, he used a canoe paddle to catch waves. Eventually, the style gained popularity among other surfers. Usually made of fiberglass and resin, these boards are a sturdy non-motorized watercraft that’s perfect for fishing, yoga , and other lake recreation. 

Banana Boats

We’re not talking about the brand of sunscreen or the delicious banana s’more dessert . Like other lake floats , banana boats are a purely recreational type of non-motorized watercraft. Shaped like a banana, these inflatables come without any type of motor system and can sometimes be tugged behind a motorized boat. Typically, they seat up to 10 people — perfect for a fun-loving group of guests at your lake house. 

Whether you choose a motorized or non-motorized personal watercraft, we hope you keep enjoying the lake in whatever way suits your lifestyle!

• Skip to Main Content
• Skip to audio player to listen live

Enter the username on file and we'll send you a code to reset your password.

A verification code has been emailed to

Unchecked development, lax regulation push Minnesota lakeshores to the edge

Create an account or log in to save stories.

Thanks for liking this story! We have added it to a list of your favorite stories.

Minnesotans are loving their lakes to death.

A statewide culture that long embraced rustic cabins by rugged lakeshores now values large homes with manicured lawns, patios, rock riprap and trees cleared to provide a better view of the water.

That generational change is easy to spot these days standing on the shoreline of popular destinations such as Gull Lake near Brainerd. Once-lush and woodsy shorelines have disappeared over decades. Lake cabins have been torn down and replaced with expansive homes. It’s a similar view across much of Minnesota.

It’s a slow-motion environmental crisis.

Support local news

When breaking news happens, MPR News provides the context you need. Help us meet the significant demands of these newsgathering efforts.

Nearly half the state’s natural shorelines are gone, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. They continue to vanish by 1 to 2 percent per decade. It's a loss rate the DNR along with local governments and nonprofits called “alarming” last year in a report that concluded “ many of Minnesota’s lakes are in trouble .”

Water running off mowed lawns and hard surfaces contributes to pollution in lakes. One-quarter of the state’s lakes have high levels of phosphorus, which feeds algae growth that turns the water a green and slimy mess. A single pound of phosphorus in a lake can produce 500 pounds of algae.

How did a state so grounded in lake culture and rule-making get to this point? Observers cite a decadeslong drip of inadequate regulation and lax enforcement by local boards and state authorities that allowed a suburban-style vision of lake life to take root, and it’s damaging lakes.

“The challenge is real,” said Randall Doneen, a water resources section manager with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 

“People have a certain aesthetic preference. And what we're seeing, really, is that it is common for people to want more of a suburban landscaping,” Doneen said. “It's no longer just the cabin up at the lake, with your path down to your dock.”

It is possible to check and repair the damage. On some Minnesota lakes, property owners and local officials have worked together to restore and protect shorelines without crippling growth. 

Getting there statewide, though, means shifting the culture and convincing people their vision of beauty is killing the thing they love. 

There’s a lot at stake beyond the health of the lakes. Pollution affects anyone who owns or visits a lake home or cabin, spends time fishing, swimming or boating, enjoys seeing loons and other wildlife, or dreams of spending their retirement years on a lake.

“We are a land of 10,000 lakes,” said Paul Radomski, a longtime lake ecologist with the DNR. “We don't want to be a land of 10,000 impaired lakes.”

‘People wanting to build bigger’

Minnesota’s treasured lakes have been drawing visitors and residents since the 1800s. A 1926 travel brochure advertised the state as “the nation’s summer playground,” according to the Minnesota Historical Society.

In recent decades, though, the nature of lake living changed. As demand for waterfront property surged and real estate prices soared, many resorts were subdivided into lots and sold. People bought modest cabins, demolished them and built showcase homes.

Tony and Bonnie Coffey bought their first lake cabin in Crow Wing County in 1994, and later settled on the Whitefish Chain of Lakes, where Tony is president of the property owners association. During that time, they’ve witnessed a boom in growth in the Brainerd Lakes Area.

“It makes it very livable, all the things we have in terms of doctors and retail and restaurants,” said Tony Coffey, who serves as president of the Whitefish Area Property Owners Association. “But what that’s done is it’s created an influx of people.”

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated that growth. With more people able to work remotely, many lake property owners decided to turn seasonal cabins into year-round homes.

“What we're seeing is people who might have thought that to maybe build their dream home would be 10 years from now, now I think it’s today,” said Chris Pence, environmental services manager for Crow Wing County. “Because now, I don't have to be down in Minneapolis to work all the time. I can work from my cabin.”

Many improved their lake property to make it less like a seasonal cabin and more like their year-round home by adding an extra bedroom, a patio or a bigger garage.

“We're seeing people wanting to build bigger,” said Nick Neuman, senior environmental specialist for Stearns County, which has nearly 300 lakes. That could mean expanding a cabin, he said, “or it might just be wanting to build a larger home on lots that maybe aren't designed for it.”

Those larger homes often have more roofs, driveways, patios and other hard surfaces that increase polluted runoff into the lake. Neuman said the increase of impervious surfaces is “probably the biggest issue” facing Minnesota’s lake country.

“That really stems from just more development, larger structures and more intensive use of the properties that already exist,” he said.

A tale of two lake properties

The whir of the outboard motor barely drowned out the sound of traffic on Highway 371 during a recent summer day in Baxter as DNR ecologists Paul Radomski and Josh Knopik stood in an aluminum boat, scanning the shoreline of Perch Lake.

Knopik paused the boat in front of a modest home. Once likely a seasonal cabin, it’s now a full-time residence. 

The sandy shoreline stretches unbroken the length of a basketball court and is lined with large stones. No shrubs or native plants are in sight, just neatly mowed, bright green grass.

“There are two tall trees,” Knopik said. “Otherwise, it's like a suburban house, just plopped next to a lake.”

Water runs off the house’s roof and driveway and across the lawn without trees or plants to slow and absorb it, Radomski said. It carries soil, organic matter and nutrients like phosphorus straight into the lake.

After a heavy rain, seven to nine times more phosphorus will run off this mowed lawn into the lake than off undeveloped lakeshore, he said.

“That has consequences on water quality,” Radomski said.

The DNR began measuring the condition of the state’s shorelines with a scientific survey in 2015. So far, it’s completed 900 surveys on more than 836 lakes across Minnesota.

A pristine lakeshore with no development would score a 100. The lowest-scoring lake so far is heavily developed Forest Lake in the northeast Twin Cities metro, which earned a 37.

The survey data has allowed the DNR to accurately assess what’s happening with Minnesota lakes and calculate the loss of natural shorelines, Radomski said.

“Quantifying it opens eyes,” he said. “People say, ‘Oh, what are we doing? What are we doing about that?’”

Mapping the data shows regional differences. Lakes in central Minnesota tend to be more populated and developed. In contrast, many northern lakes still have wooded, natural shorelines that help protect water quality and provide wildlife habitat.

Farther down the shore of Perch Lake, Knopik paused the boat in front of a much different property. The house is almost hidden, set back about 100 feet from shore. The owners have kept most of the trees and a thick buffer of cattails along the shore.

The residents still have a mowed lawn, but the vegetation along the water’s edge should absorb any runoff, Knopik said. It’s “a compromise of sorts,” he said.

Finding a way to both enjoy the lake and preserve it is the message the DNR is advocating to lake property owners, Radomski said.

“How do you find that balance between having that shoreline vegetation so that it protects water quality and provides the habitat, but you still get to have a great experience on the water?” he said.

‘A problem that didn’t have to exist’

The disappearance of natural shorelines has other profound effects. 

A sandy beach or rock riprap supplies little food or shelter for wildlife. But vegetation along the shoreline is critical for nesting loons. Aquatic plants provide cover for fish, and fallen trees offer a resting spot for turtles and frogs.

Natural shorelines also help prevent erosion, a common problem on many Minnesota lakes — especially as climate change causes heavier rainfalls and more frequent flooding. 

Native plants’ roots can grow as long as 15 feet, much longer than the Kentucky bluegrass found in most Minnesota lawns. Those deeper roots help hold the soil in place.

Ironically, changes residents make to “improve” their lake property often cause more problems.

Riprap is often a solution property owners and landscape contractors use to fix erosion problems along lakeshore. But the rocks actually can increase the speed and temperature of water running into the lake, and provide no habitat for pollinators or other wildlife.

A mowed lawn edged with rock might look tidy, but it can attract unwelcome guests. Knopik points to a Perch Lake shoreline strung with an unsightly plastic fence.

“They’ve probably struggled with geese going on their lawn and defecating and eating and doing what they do,” he said. “That’s annoying.” 

In contrast, deep-rooted native plants and trees help stabilize the shoreline, prevent erosion and discourage geese, Knopik said.

“The riprap is like a Band-Aid or a solution to a problem that didn’t have to exist,” he said. 

There’s an economic impact, too. Studies have linked lakes with good water quality to higher property values.

Regulation ‘not working’

Minnesota has regulated development around lakes for more than 50 years, but the current shoreline rules were last updated in 1989 and many scientists consider them outdated and inadequate. 

“Clearly, they're not working,” Radomski said. “We're still losing habitat.”

The Legislature directed the DNR to update the state’s shoreland rules in 2007, and Minnesota regulators spent years devising more protective standards. But then-Gov. Tim Pawlenty rejected them, saying they undermined local control and property rights.

This year, state lawmakers reaffirmed that the DNR still has the authority to update the shoreland rules. But it’s unclear whether there’s political will for tighter statewide regulations.

In Minnesota, it’s up to local governments — cities and counties — to enforce shoreland regulations, and their record is mixed. Historically, counties approve many requests for variances to the rules.

“Regulations have not stopped shoreline alterations, lot by lot, year by year, and lake by lake,” stated a report released last year by the Minnesota Natural Shoreline Partnership, a coalition that includes conservation professionals from the DNR, local government agencies and nonprofits.

The report says a “reasonable goal” would be a natural, unmowed buffer of trees and vegetation that stretches for 75 percent of the shoreline and is at least 25 feet deep, far from the norm on many Minnesota lakes. 

While state rules prohibit “intensive” clearing of vegetation near the shore, they’re open to interpretation and sometimes difficult to enforce. 

“People want to be able to enjoy seeing the lake, and they see the trees and the shrubs as an impediment to their view,” Doneen said. “That's a real challenge, because you want people to be able to enjoy the lake without degrading it so much.”

The DNR occasionally intervenes and challenges a county’s decision to issue a shoreland variance if it violates state or local rules, but those cases are not the norm. 

The agency prefers to provide education for local government officials and, if needed, share its concerns about a development proposal, Doneen said.

“If it comes down to it and it’s egregious, and we think that the resources being sacrificed are significant and that there really has been a legal error, we’ll step in if we have to,” he said. “But it is the absolute last thing that we would want to do.”

‘People like to push the envelope’

While there’s been little political will to tighten the state’s shoreland rules, some counties have adopted their own regulations that go beyond the state’s minimum requirements. 

Crow Wing County, with close to 500 lakes, allows up to 25 percent of a lake property to be covered with hard surfaces such as roofs, driveways and patios. But anything over 15 percent requires a plan to use rain gardens or other techniques to manage stormwater.

That's the threshold studies have shown could start to affect water quality, Pence said.

About three years ago, Stearns County began requiring property owners to have a minimum amount of natural shoreline before they can get a permit to make any changes near the lake. It’s had a significant impact, Neuman said.

“People like to push the envelope,” he said. “So that's where the regulatory measures really are a safeguard to protect whatever you know is worth protecting.”

• Survey: Are you a lake steward?

State and local governments, watershed districts, nonprofits and lake associations have worked to educate property owners about the importance of keeping shoreline natural. Results are mixed.

Most people make decisions about their lake property based on economics and what others around them are doing, Neuman said.

“We can promote and we can suggest and we can recommend,” he said. “But the vast majority of people — and therefore contractors, because they are trying to meet the wants of their clients — are going to be interested in making it look the way they want it to look.”

Some lake advocates are thinking beyond regulations about how to change societal norms beyond perfectly manicured lawns and boat lifts and docks that resemble a marina, said Joe Shneider, president of the Minnesota Coalition of Lake Associations.

“It doesn’t help our water quality,” Shneider said. “And at the end of the day, it's really all about protecting the quality of the water.”

Funding for this series is provided in part by the Four Cedars Environmental Fund of the Duluth Superior Area Community Foundation.

Correction (Aug. 15, 2025): An earlier version of this story misidentified aerial images of a popular Gull Lake point in a neighboring county, rather than Cass County. The article has been updated.

• 10 key data points and graphs about loss of shoreline on Minnesota’s lakes
• In NW Wisconsin, a county finds paying homeowners to keep shorelines natural pays off
• ‘Quit mowing’: Turning Minnesota lake homeowners into shoreline stewards, one lawn at a time

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

4.4-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Near Los Angeles

The quake was centered about five miles northeast of downtown, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. There were no initial reports of serious damage.

Shake intensity

By Soumya Karlamangla and Jill Cowan

Millions across Southern California were rattled on Monday afternoon by a 4.4-magnitude earthquake, though there were no reports of significant damage, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The earthquake hit at 12:20 p.m. and was centered just outside of Pasadena, about five miles northeast of downtown Los Angeles, according to the agency.

“It was a pretty good jolt,” said Susan Hough, a seismologist with the U.S.G.S. who was on the California Institute of Technology campus in Pasadena when the earthquake struck. “It was clearly a decent shake, though not huge.”

The earthquake, which was followed two minutes later by a 2.1-magnitude aftershock, was felt more than 100 miles away in Bakersfield, San Diego and Joshua Tree National Park, according to the U.S.G.S. The earthquake’s epicenter was in El Sereno, a small neighborhood in northeast Los Angeles.

Ms. Hough said that scientists were not yet sure which fault had produced the earthquake, though it appeared close to the Puente Hills Fault, which runs through the Los Angeles basin into northern Orange County. The fault line, discovered in 1999 , can produce devastating earthquakes, scientists say, and was responsible for the 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake that killed eight people.

As of midafternoon, there had been no initial reports of widespread damage from Monday’s quake, said Margaret Stewart, a spokeswoman for the Los Angeles Fire Department. Firefighters from each of the city’s 106 fire stations were driving through their districts to survey any effects, she said, and would soon be able to provide more detailed assessments.

The California Highway Patrol also said that it hadn’t received any reports of accidents or damage related to the quake.

In Pasadena, the leafy suburb not far from the center of the quake, students in local schools who were back for their first day of the new year got a real-life “drop, hold and cover” drill, though there were no reports of injuries or damage, said Lisa Derderian, a spokeswoman for the city.

At Houston’s, a bustling power lunch spot where Ms. Derderian was eating, she said, the couple hundred diners in the restaurant suddenly stopped their conversations as the temblor rattled the room.

“It was silent, which you would never hear there,” she said. “People looked around, then resumed eating.”

Ms. Derderian said that city crews were dispatched to survey for damage. Where they found it was City Hall.

The old, ornate building, recognizable for its facade’s numerous appearances in movies, was finished in 1927 but was retrofitted for earthquake safety in 2007, Ms. Derderian said.

Nevertheless, she said, a pipe there burst during Monday’s temblor and was spewing water from the third story down the outside of the building for about 45 minutes. The elevators stopped automatically, trapping one person who was quickly rescued.

The pipe break triggered the building’s fire alarm, Ms. Derderian said, so the building was evacuated and city employees stood in the heat for the better part of an hour. There was no evidence of structural damage, she said.

Ms. Derderian said she hoped that the temblor, coupled with the one last week, would remind people to prepare for the bigger earthquake that has long been expected. On Aug. 6, a moderately strong, 5.2-magnitude quake centered near Bakersfield rattled a wide swath of Southern California.

“We need to make it a priority,” she said.

Across the rest of the northeastern part of Los Angeles, residents said they were startled but largely unharmed.

In the Highland Park neighborhood, thuds and shudders ran through homes, followed by several seconds of powerful and sustained shaking. A kitchen cabinet door flung open in one house, though all of its contents stayed inside. A few residents gathered on one street, babies and dogs in tow, marveling at how intense the quake had felt, though no one reported any damage.

Not far away in Silver Lake during a cycling class, the bikes swayed slightly, giving some riders a woozy feeling, but the class continued. As students left the fitness studio, they compared text messages from friends and family asking if they were safe.

A video posted on X showed the ESPN studio in downtown Los Angeles shaking during a live broadcast.

“From the data we’re getting, the shaking was just barely strong enough to maybe knock a few things off of shelves — that was the peak shaking we’re seeing,” Ms. Hough said. “It wasn’t strong enough to cause damage.”

Tejal Rao contributed reporting from Los Angeles.

Soumya Karlamangla reports on California news and culture and is based in San Francisco. She writes the California Today newsletter. More about Soumya Karlamangla

Jill Cowan is a Times reporter based in Los Angeles, covering the forces shaping life in Southern California and throughout the state. More about Jill Cowan

Earthquake strikes Lake Elsinore, seismologist says quakes on rise in Southern California

Seismologist Dr. Lucy Jones said this year, there have been 13 earthquakes in Southern California with magnitudes of 4.0 or greater.

On Thursday, the U.S. Geological Survey nearly added another scale when it reported a preliminary magnitude 3.9 quake just west of Lake Elsinore in Riverside County.

The earthquake struck at about 9:39 a.m. at a depth about 5.5 miles away. According to the USGS, it was followed by a 3.0-magnitude aftershock.

No injuries or damage have been reported.

The earthquake occurred west of the lake, about two miles south of Interstate 15 and north of Lakeside High School.

Has California faced more earthquakes recently?

On Monday, Dr. Jones, with the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, said recently, there has been an increase in stronger earthquakes in Southern California.

Related: Don't wait for the big one. This is what to do before, during and after an earthquake

Jones explained that the number of earthquakes greater than 4.0 in 2024 is closer to the average recorded in Southern California over the past 90 years.

California hit by other recent earthquakes

On Monday, a magnitude 4.4 earthquake struck near Highland Park in Los Angeles County. 

On Aug. 6, a 5.2-magnitude earthquake was centered in the Bakersfield area, about 15.5 miles southwest of Lamont in Kern County Nearly 24 hours later, the USGS detected more than 60 aftershocks within 20 miles of the epicenter.

On July 29, a magnitude-4.9 earthquake and two aftershocks of magnitude-3.5 and 2.8 struck the Barstow area. The earthquake fault nearest the epicenter is the Calico Fault.

Speed Boating Lakes in PA

Forget smooth rides and tranquil waters: some travelers have the need for speed — and rapids! Don’t get us wrong, we love a good picnic and can’t resist the chance to cast a fishing line, but adrenaline wins every so often. This summer, practice your water skiing, hold onto your inner tube, and kick it up a notch at some of the best boating lakes in PA just made for powerboating.

Don’t forget to have your boat registered with the PA Fish & Boat Commission . Out-of-state friends need not worry, it is legal to operate a boat registered in another state on Pennsylvania waters.

Join PA's Travel Newsletter

1. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE

Maximum Lake Speed: unlimited in portions

Shenango River Lake , one of the best boating lakes near Cleveland, has six boat launch ramps located around the reservoir — an 11-mile-long stretch of water that accommodates powerboats of unlimited horsepower. Feed your need for an adrenaline rush when you try your hand at wakeboarding, water skiing, knee boarding, tubing, wake surfing, air chair, or wakeskating!

2. CURWENSVILLE LAKE

Maximum Lake Speed: no horsepower limitations

You’ll find Curwensville Lake in the Pennsylvania Wilds, but you won’t find any limits on horsepower. At the 790-acre lake, children 12 years of age or younger are required to wear a life jacket when underway on a boat that is 20' or less. Watercraft operators, passengers, sailboarders, water skiers or anyone being towed behind a boat must also wear a life jacket.

3. LAKE AUGUSTA

Located at the confluence of the west and north branches of the Susquehanna River, the 3,060-acre Lake Augusta is formed by the world’s largest inflatable dam. When the dam is raised in the summer, the real fun begins! The dam raises the water level at least eight feet and creates four miles of unhindered boating.

4. LAKE WALLENPAUPACK

Maximum Lake Speed: 45 miles per hour | no horsepower limitations

Speed and size — Lake Wallenpaupack in the Pocono Mountains is a massive 5,700 acres, 13 miles long, with 52 miles of shoreline, and 60 feet deep at its maximum depth. Jet skiing, wakeboarding, and water skiing are all up for grabs on these waters, so hold on tight!

5. RAYSTOWN LAKE

Maximum Lake Speed: no speed or horsepower limitations

Forget about the rules, because there are no horsepower or size restrictions for boats on Raystown Lake in The Alleghenies. This motor boating lake near Penn State features 110 miles of underdeveloped shoreline as most summer homes weren’t built on the water. The shore is lined with trees, making for a unique scene while you cruise by on one of the most boat friendly lakes PA has to offer. Operated by the Army Corp of Engineers, Raystown is up to 200 feet deep.

6. BELTZVILLE LAKE

Maximum Lake Speed: 45 miles per hour

With a 19.8-mile shoreline and nearly 1,000 acres of open water, Beltzville Lake in the Pocono Mountains is the centerpiece of the state park and a hotbed of H2O happiness. Along the northern shore of the lake, visitors can use the three-lane boat launching ramp and dock. Boats are permitted to ride up to 45 miles per hour, so hold on tight — you’ll have plenty of room for waterskiing or tubing!

To learn more about lake vacations, check out the VISIT PA website . Follow us on Facebook , X , Pinterest , YouTube , TikTok , and Instagram to stay up-to-date on even more great ideas and places to visit around our state. Don’t forget to sign up for our monthly PA travel e-newsletter so you never miss an update!

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use our website, we will assume that you are happy to receive all cookies (and milk!) from visitPA.com. Learn more about cookie data in our Privacy Policy

Trump rally shooter Thomas Crooks: Neighbors, classmates, employer speak

A 20-year-old man from Pennsylvania fired multiple shots at former President Donald Trump at a rally on Saturday evening.

A bullet grazed the presumptive Republican presidential nominee's upper right ear , leaving him bloodied but not seriously injured. One rally attendee was killed in the gunfire and two others were "critically injured," authorities later said.

Here's what we know:

Who is the shooter at the rally?

The FBI identified Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, as the person behind the assassination attempt. Agency officials released little additional information, saying its investigation remains active and ongoing. They did not indicate what Crooks' motive might have been.

Crooks worked at a nearby nursing home. An administrator there told USA TODAY that the company was shocked to learn of the shooting and that Crooks had passed a background check for his job.

What did Thomas Crooks do at the crime scene?

During the shooting Saturday, Trump's right ear was injured, seconds before he was whisked off stage by Secret Service personnel.  One man attending the rally was killed  and two others were injured; Crooks was then killed by Secret Service agents , authorities said.

FBI special agent Kevin Rojek said on a call with media Sunday afternoon that authorities found "a suspicious device" when they searched the shooter's vehicle. Bomb technicians inspected the device and rendered it safe. 

"I'm not in a position to provide any expertise on the specific components of any potential bombs or suspicious packages," Rojek added. 

Rojek said law enforcement is sending the rifle and Crooks' cell phone, along with other evidence, to the FBI lab in Quantico, Virginia "for processing and exploitation."

"We're in the process of searching his phone," Rojek said.

Maps and graphics: What happened in the Trump assassination attempt

What is Crooks' background?

Crooks is registered to vote as a Republican in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, according to county voter records. His voter registration status has been active since 2021.

Federal Election Commission records show that in January 2021, Crooks made a $15 donation to the Progressive Turnout Project, a group working to increase voter turnout for Democrats.

Born Sept. 20, 2003, Crooks does not have a criminal record in Pennsylvania, nor has he been sued there, according to state court records. There is no record of him in federal court databases, either.

Where did Thomas Crooks work?

Crooks worked as a dietary aid, a job that generally involves food preparation, at Bethel Park Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation, less than a mile from his home. In a statement provided to USA TODAY on Sunday, Marcie Grimm, the facility's administrator, said she was "shocked and saddened to learn of his involvement."

"Thomas Matthew Crooks performed his job without concern and his background check was clean," Grimm said. "We are fully cooperating with law enforcement officials at this time. Due to the ongoing investigation, we cannot comment further on any specifics. Our thoughts and prayers go out to Former President Trump and the victims impacted by this terrible tragedy. We condemn all acts of violence."

The facility is owned by Kennett Square, Pennsylvania-based Genesis Healthcare. A job posting from the company for a dietary aid in the Pittsburgh area puts the pay at $16 an hour.

Thomas Crooks from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania

Crooks' home address is listed in Bethel Park, a suburb in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area, voter records show. That three-bedroom brick house has been owned since 1998 by Matthew and Mary Crooks, who appear to be his parents. Telephone calls to the couple were not returned overnight.

Near the Crooks home, Dean Sierka, 52, said he had known Crooks and his parents for years, as neighbors separated by only a few houses. Sierka’s daughter attended school with Crooks from elementary school through Bethel Park High School, and said she remembers him as quiet and shy.

Dean and his daughter said they would see Crooks at least once a week, often when Crooks was walking to work.

“You wouldn’t have expected this,” Dean Sierka said. “The parents and the family are all really nice people.”

At Bethel Park High School

Thomas Crooks graduated two years ago from Bethel Park High School, the Bethel Park School District confirmed. He was included in a 2022 local news article about recipients of a National Math & Science Initiative Star Award at the public high school, which enrolls about 1,300 students.

Jason Kohler attended Bethel Park High School with Crooks and said he remembers the 20-year-old sat alone at lunch and was “bullied almost every day.” Kids picked on Crooks for wearing camouflage to class and his quiet demeanor, Kohler, 21, said.

Since hearing Crooks has been named as the shooter, Kohler has been speaking with classmates who knew him, most of whom are stunned by the news.“It’s really hard to comprehend,” he said.

Sean Eckert said he went to school with Crooks from 5th through 12th grade. He said Crooks always went by “Tom.“

They shared classes together in elementary and middle school. Eckert said Crooks, though "fairly smart," was quiet and rarely spoke up.

Eckert said Crooks did not seem to have many friends. He didn't recall Crooks being playing any sports, being involved in any clubs or student groups or going to popular campus events. He often wore hunting clothes, so Eckert assumed he hunted.

No one in Eckert's group text from high school seemed to know Crooks very well, he said. They were shocked that someone from their town had done this. They were even more surprised that it was Tom Crooks.

Nursing aide turned sniper: Thomas Crooks' mysterious plot to kill Trump

The gaming-oriented online site Discord said Sunday that it had found an account that appeared to be linked to the shooting suspect. The site removed the account, which “was rarely utilized, has not been used in months, and we have found no evidence that it was used to plan this incident, promote violence, or discuss his political views,“ according to a statement from a Discord spokesperson, adding that the company will coordinate closely with law enforcement.

Crooks was a member of the Clairton Sportsmen’s Club, a shooting club about 8 miles from his home. It is a sprawling complex of 180 acres with rifle, pistol and archery ranges, an area for dog training and a clubhouse, according to the club website.An attorney for the club, Robert Bootay III, confirmed Crooks' membership in an email to USA TODAY, but would not offer additional details.

Where is Bethel Park, Pennsylvania?

Bethel Park is a suburb of Pittsburgh and home to more than 32,000 people – about one thousand fewer than four years ago, according to the latest Census estimates. 

The majority-white, mostly college-educated community has a median household income of $102,177. 

Described as a charming retreat from the hustle and bustle of the big city to its north, Bethel Park boasts tree-line streets, friendly neighborhoods and a low crime rate.

Bethel Park is about 42 miles south of Butler, where the Trump rally was held. The leafy suburban street was alive with law enforcement overnight amid a multi-agency response to the shooting. A member of the Allegheny County bomb squad told reporters his team was headed into the house around midnight, but did not say why.

For hours afterward, the scene remained quiet, with deer passing under the police tape and an occasional neighbor stepping out of their house to see what was happening.

John Wolf, a local construction superintendent who lives down the road, said he’d talked with several worried neighbors.

“People are scared,” Wolf said.

How did Crooks shoot at Trump?

Crooks had been positioned on a rooftop more than 100 yards from the rally site, Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi said. Law enforcement recovered an AR-style rifle from the scene.

Joseph Price, special agent in charge of the ATF in Pittsburgh, said the weapon used by the shooter was a rifle.“It was nothing special,” he said in an interview in the parking lot of the Butler Township Municipal Building.

Law enforcement is following up on a “number of suspicious occurrences,” said Lt. Col. George Bivens of the Pennsylvania State Police, including accounts from witnesses who said they tried to flag police about the activity of a person outside the rally moments before the shooting.

The FBI said in a news release that the situation “remains an active and ongoing investigation, and anyone with information that may assist with the investigation is encouraged to submit photos or videos online at  FBI.gov/butler  or call 1-800-CALL-FBI.”

Contributing: Stephanie Warsmith, Tim Evans, Aysha Bagchi, Jessica Guynn, Bryce Buyakie

Press Herald

Account Subscription: ACTIVE

Questions about your account? Our customer service team can be reached at [email protected] during business hours at (207) 791-6000 .

• Times Record

Seniors Not Acting Their Age: To the Goslings and back

You are able to gift 5 more articles this month.

Anyone can access the link you share with no account required. Learn more .

With a Press Herald subscription, you can gift 5 articles each month.

It looks like you do not have any active subscriptions. To get one, go to the subscriptions page .

Loading....

Paddlers cross Mere Point Bay towards Upper Goose Island. Ron Chase photos

Mere Point Boat Launch in Brunswick provides boat access to Mere Point Bay. Nearby Maquoit and Middle Bays are also easily reached from this location. Operated by the Town of Brunswick, the upscale facility offers all-tide deep-water entry and egress. Amenities include two boat ramps, a large dock, lots of parking, two toilets and a picnic area.

There is a downside. According to the town, the landing also provides an option to separately launch kayaks and hand-carry watercraft. This is misleading as the steep narrow stairs and weird contraption supposedly designed to lower kayaks down to the water is, in my opinion, unsafe. I never use it and I don’t know any other kayakers who do. Instead, the ramps are our choice to embark and disembark; a far safer alternative.

I wrote the Town of Brunswick about my safety concerns but they never responded. The landing was built by the State of Maine at the taxpayer’s expense. It would seem reasonable to conclude the intent of constructing the facility was to create a safe launching environment for all users, not just motor craft.

Located near the end of Mere Point about 6 miles from the business section of Brunswick, the landing also provides convenient access to a multitude of islands in the northern Casco Bay region, including the Goose and Gosling Islands. I recently announced a Penobscot Paddle & Chowder sea kayak trip departing from the Mere Point Boat Launch. My planned destination was West Gosling Island where a Maine Island Trail Association campsite is located. Happily, two frequent sea kayak companions, Ellen and Mark Nelson, agreed to join me.

Kayakers prepare to depart from Mere Point Boat Launch.

The three of us met at the landing on a hot, steamy morning. Light to moderate winds out of the southwest were predicted and the tides were going to be uncooperative for most of the day. We launched our kayaks from one of the ramps without problems. My experience has been that kayaks and motorized crafts are quite compatible when loading and unloading. Patience and respect for one another are the keys.

A light sea breeze was a refreshing relief from the sultry air crossing Mere Point Bay to Upper Goose Island, about a 1-mile expanse of open water. We passed an oyster farm on the east side of Upper Goose before progressing beyond a narrow channel that separates it from Lower Goose. Advertisement

The tiny Gosling Islands were visible in the distance as we navigated along Lower Goose. Several moorings populate the area between the southeastern end of Lower Goose and the Goslings. On most summer days, numerous pleasure crafts are parked there. Not on this occasion — only two lonely vessels were taking advantage of the ideal boating weather.

West Gosling has a sandy beach that facilitates an easy landing. Shortly after we pulled our kayaks onto the shore, a team of MITA employees arrived in a motorboat and cleaned the site. We found shade from the sun next to the campsite for our lunch break. While walking the shoreline, Ellen discovered a substantial community of periwinkles in the intertidal zone, something I’d missed during previous visits.

We considered paddling a long mile farther south to Little Whaleboat Island. After further discussion, our decision was to travel west across the bay to a chain of islands leading north to Mere Point.

As we were advancing towards the northern terminus of Bustins Island, Mark noted a fog bank was approaching Little Whaleboat. By the time we stopped at the next island, Pettingil, it was completely enveloped in fog. Our serendipitous decision to forego the traverse to Little Whaleboat was a fortuitous one.

Progressing north along Williams Island while taking advantage of a tailwind, we inexplicably encountered turbulent seas. There didn’t appear to be any obvious explanation. We speculated that underwater shoals coupled with strong tidal currents were probably the cause.

Sister Island is northern-most in the sequence of islands before Mere Point. Given the earlier choppiness, the 1-mile passage between them that connects Mere Point and Maquoit Bays was surprisingly calm.

The launch area was busy when we arrived. No problems were experienced while using a ramp to disembark.

My book, “Maine Al Fresco: The Fifty Finest Outdoor Adventures in Maine,” describes eight more exciting sea kayak excursions along the Maine coast.

Ron Chase resides in Topsham. His latest book, “Maine Al Fresco: The Fifty Finest Outdoor Adventures in Maine,” is available at northcountrypress.com/maine-al-fresco  or in bookstores and through online retailers. His previous books are “The Great Mars Hill Bank Robbery” and “Mountains for Mortals – New England.” Visit his website at ronchaseoutdoors.com  or he can be reached at  [email protected].

Mark Nelson approaches West Gosling Island.

Modify your screen name

Join the Conversation

Please sign into your Press Herald account to participate in conversations below. If you do not have an account, you can register or subscribe . Questions? Please see our FAQs .

Your commenting screen name has been updated.

Send questions/comments to the editors.

• Staff Directory
• Send a Story Tip
• Send a Letter to the Editor
• Contact Advertising
• Place an Obituary
• Midcoast Now Newsletter
• Midcoast for the Record newsletter
• ePaper Delivery Alert

Subscribers

• Manage Your Account
• Log a Delivery Issue
• Subscriber Benefits

Maine Trust for Local News Network

• Centralmaine.com
• Pressherald.com
• Sunjournal.com
• Varsity Maine
• Maine Trust for Local News Events
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Terms of Service
• Commenting Terms
• Public Notices
• Photo Store
• Merch Store
• Archive Search

Member Log In

Please enter your username and password below. Already a subscriber but don't have one? Click here .

Not a subscriber? Click here to see your options

• Search forums
• Members Current visitors

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

• PNW Fly Fishing
• Watercraft/Sonar

WA electric only lakes: Can't even have your gas motor on the boat?

• Thread starter Thread starter Josh
• Start date Start date Jul 28, 2022

Dead in the water

• Jul 28, 2022

Took the boat to a local electric lake to see how a bow mount bracket I'd cobbled together worked (Narrator: "It did not work well.....at all"). I left my gas 9.9hp on the back because it's just a little heavy for me to take off myself. I had it tilted up out of the water and didn't even have a gas tank with me. But I got an earful from an old dude (who I think was just trying to be helpful) telling me I'd get a ticket just for HAVING the gas motor on the boat. Is this true? Does it vary by lake/county? Or are there statewide rules? Who gives the tickets? WDFW?  

Life of the Party

Electric engines​.

Chadk said: https://www.eregulations.com/assets/docs/guides/22WAFW.pdf WDFW says NO But maybe.... NOTE ABOUT LAKES. https://snohomishcountywa.gov/850/Boating-Launching Possibly in Snoho county.... Click to expand...

There are also lakes that have horsepower restrictions. A warden told me that it was ok to have a motor on the boat that exceeded the limit as long as i didnt use it.  

troutpocket

Stillwater strategist.

Early this spring I saw a big sparkly bass vessel pull into the launch at a little King County lake with a no gas motor rule. I was tisk-tisking the guy until I saw he had his lower unit on his 200hp wrapped up. It was some kind of motor diaper. He just used the bow mount electric to scoot around the shoreline throwing 12” swim baits. There must be a product available to be in compliance for those lakes?  

troutpocket said: Early this spring I saw a big sparkly bass vessel pull into the launch at a little King County lake with a no gas motor rule. I was tisk-tisking the guy until I saw he had his lower unit on his 200hp wrapped up. It was some kind of motor diaper. He just used the bow mount electric to scoot around the shoreline throwing 12” swim baits. There must be a product available to be in compliance for those lakes? Click to expand...

Grandpa, Small Stream Fanatic

Our local lake is operated by the COE, no gas motors at lake. "Boating on the lake is limited to paddling, rowing, wind power, or vessels with electric motors. ***No gas engines are allowed on the water at any time. This policy protects the lake from unwanted pollutants associated with gasoline-operated motors and provides maximum space for vessels compatible with the lake’s small size." One of the guys helping brought a boat with a motor to set buoys for the triathlon one year, it was a PITA doing it by canoe.  

CRO said: If the lake is managed by WDFW no gas motors on the vessel. Click to expand...

Let.It.Swing

The lakes I fish with motor restrictions (like Cassidy) post signs at the boat launches. No sign and nothing in the WDFW regs for the lake would suggest you're free to power your boat as you please. It would seem to be common sense, but as we all know that's not something our govt institutions are known for.  

Josh said: I guess my question is, how do you know what lakes are "managed" by WDFW vs a city/county regulation? Click to expand...

• Jul 30, 2022

So are we thinking that if the restriction is listed in the WDFW rules, then that is a WDFW "managed" lake and we can't have a gas motor on the boat. But if it's not listed, and there is still a restriction, then it would be up to how the individual city/county law is worded?  

"WDFW does not regulate the general use of watercraft on lakes, ponds, reservoirs, rivers, marine areas, or other waters. Boating restrictions, including motorized boating prohibitions, are established by local ordinance. Consult your local county or city for information." https://wdfw.wa.gov/places-to-go/water-access-sites  

Tom Butler said: "WDFW does not regulate the general use of watercraft on lakes, ponds, reservoirs, rivers, marine areas, or other waters. Boating restrictions, including motorized boating prohibitions, are established by local ordinance. Consult your local county or city for information." https://wdfw.wa.gov/places-to-go/water-access-sites Click to expand...

Chadk said: https://www.eregulations.com/assets/docs/guides/22WAFW.pdf WDFW says NO Internal Combustion Motors Prohibited Fishing from a floating device with an internal combustion motor attached is not allowed regardless of whether the motor is in the water or not. Click to expand...

Josh said: But that seems to directly contradict what Chadk shared from the WDFW rules (pg 18) earlier in the thread: Click to expand...

Josh said: So are we thinking that if the restriction is listed in the WDFW rules, then that is a WDFW "managed" lake and we can't have a gas motor on the boat. But if it's not listed, and there is still a restriction, then it would be up to how the individual city/county law is worded? Click to expand...

Bambooflyguy

Lone lake has the stupidest rules about gas motors.....you can’t have one on your boat fishing but you can if you’re waterskiing??? Troll fast if the warden shows up? That’s my pet trout waterskiing!  

Just a useless Old Man.

I haven't fished in Washington for over 15 years. When I did fish there that same law was in the books. People always seem to act dumb when confronted by a ranger. They say they don't understand the law as written. You weren't allowed to even hang down, for fear of it leaking oil out of the shaft.  

Some of the confusion lies in just what action a specific authority controls. WDFW does not control navigation. WDFW controls fishing. So WDFW may have a regulation that specifies one may not fish from a boat equipped with a motor even if motors are allowed on that water body for navigation by the county. Ergo, Lone Lake and its motor restriction for fishing, but you can have a motor for water skiing on that same lake. So you need to check WDFW regulations to see if motors are allowed for fishing and whichever authority manages the lake for navigation restrictions on motors.  

Some assclowns will back their big boats on the lake boat ramp, start their motors to flush out the salt water.....really??  

From our Media Gallery

• Adirondack Explorer
• Adventure Planner
• Email Newsletter

Paddling: The Myth of Motor-free Adirondack Waters

Of the 200 largest lakes and ponds in the Adirondack Park, from Lake Champlain, with 262,864 acres, to Round Pond in Indian Lake, covering 134.9 acres, the overwhelming majority of big lakes and ponds provide abundant opportunities for motorized watercraft—but scant opportunity for quiet, motor-free waters.

Protect the Adirondacks has just released a new report entitled The Myth of Quiet, Motor-free Waters in the Adirondack Park . This report analyzed the public uses on the 200 largest lakes and ponds in the Adirondack Park. What we found is that there are relatively few opportunities for motor-free experiences on the biggest, most accessible lakes and ponds in the Adirondacks.

Protect the Adirondacks believes that the largest lakes in the Adirondack Park provide the most accessible opportunities for public water-based recreation. But the supply of motor-free experiences on these waterbodies is low when compared to the abundance of opportunities for motorized watercraft. There needs to be greater equity for motor-free waters recreation so that the Adirondack Park can better meet the public’s demand for a wide spectrum of outdoor recreational opportunities. There is a great demand for recreational experiences on accessible, motor-free lakes and ponds. The demand is high, but the supply is low.

Two lakes in the Adirondack Park’s Top 200 are soon to be classified by the Adirondack Park Agency: Third Lake (Number 94, 340 acres) and Boreas Pond (Number 95, 338 acres). The APA’s Forest Preserve classification review, which is ultimately made official by approval of the governor, will determine the types of public uses allowable on these lakes. Protect the Adirondacks supports Wilderness classification for these two remote lakes. This would help to correct the imbalance of waters available for all types of motorized watercraft and motor-free waters.

Low Supply, High Demand

Across the Adirondack Park there are few genuine opportunities for motor-free boating on a big lake or pond. In the top 100 biggest lakes in the Adirondack Park, just five lakes stand out as lakes without motorboats, jetskis, and floatplanes; Lows Lake, Little Tupper Lake, Round Lake, Lake Lila, and St. Regis Pond. These lakes are all managed as motor-free waterbodies as parts of the Forest Preserve. Three other lakes, Cedar Lake in the West Canada Lakes Wilderness Area, Newcomb Lake in the High Peaks Wilderness, and Pharaoh Lake in the Pharaoh Lake Wilderness, are also motor-free, but they are largely inaccessible for boating by the general public. They are great lakes to hike to, and extraordinarily beautiful places, but they are difficult to reach with a boat.

Of the 100 biggest lakes in the Adirondack Park, 77 are open for all manner of motorized boating and floatplanes. 13 lakes are privately owned and provide no public access, and just 8 are motor-free. Two lakes in the top 100 are currently in process of being purchased by the State of New York for addition to the Forest Preserve, after which the type of allowable public use will be determined through a public review process. The reality, therefore, is that more than 75% of the Park’s grandest lakes are open for motorized activity while only 8% offer the motor-free option, and just 5% are easily accessible for a motor-free experience.

For those who desire greater motor-free opportunities, the numbers improve slightly in an analysis of the 200 biggest lakes in the Adirondack Park. 115 (57%) of the Park’s 200 biggest lakes are open for motorized uses, 54 (27.5%) are privately-owned and thus closed, and 29 (14.5%) are open and motorless. However, of these 29 motor-free lakes, just 17 (9%) are easily accessible without long carries.

When one compares the acreage of waters open for motor-free and motorized opportunities, the differences are stark. Fully 96% of the total surface water area of the 100 biggest lakes and ponds in the Adirondack Park is dedicated to motorized boating; just 2% is open for public motor-free recreation. If we subtract Lake Champlain, which at 262,864 acres is vast and located partly in Vermont, and look only at waterbodies completely within the Blue Line, the amount of water area dedicated to motorized water uses is 90%. Just 5% is open for public motor-free opportunities.

If we expand our data to look at the surface areas of the 200 biggest lakes in the Adirondack Park, 93% are dedicated to motorized uses. If Lake Champlain is excluded, the figure drops to 84% open for motorized uses. Only 7% of the acreage in these 200 biggest waters is devoted to motor-free use, and this figure includes the acreage for motor-free waterbodies that are difficult to reach with a boat.

The PROTECT report provides a table listing the 200 largest lakes and ponds in the Adirondack Park from Lake Champlain (262,864 acres), to Round Pond (135 acres in the Town of Indian Lake). The table provides the locations of these waterbodies, waterbody acreage and allowable uses.

In addition to the fact that there is a low supply of motor-free waters for the big lakes and ponds in the Adirondack Park, there are also many other reasons why it’s critical to create more motor-free opportunities for the public. The following details the importance of motor-free waters for natural resource protection and public recreational use.

Natural Resource Stewardship

Of all the reasons to expand the number of motor-free waters among the large lakes in the Adirondack Park, natural resource stewardship is vital. Here are some particulars:

• The threat of aquatic invasive species infestations is vastly less for motor-free waterbodies than waters open to motorboating. Evidence is overwhelming that motorboats are the key vectors of spreading aquatic invasive species from lake to lake. The chances of infestation are significantly less for spreading invasives with the “cartop” fleet of boats. It’s far easier to see any vegetation or debris hanging on a canoe or kayak and they are easier to clean. There are no boat trailers where water can pool or debris or plants can become suspended. It’s much more difficult to transport standing water on a canoe or kayak.
• Motor-free waters provide better habitat for nesting waterfowl and wildlife. Motorboats disturb nesting waterfowl. It’s been documented that species, like loons, will nest on a quiet lake, and travel to forage on larger lakes. Motorboats have the impact of forcing nesting birds off their nests and some nests are even swamped by waves.
• Waves and erosion have a major impact along shorelines. Impacts are far greater on waters with heavy motorboating, than on motor-free waters. Lakes and ponds that experience high levels of motor boat use also experience instances of shoreline erosion due to incessant wave action on busy days.  

Quiet and Solitude

Several dozen canoes and kayaks can be in simultaneous use on a motor-free lake or pond, such as Lake Lila or Round Lake, and the experience remains one of tranquility. Put several dozen motorboats on one such lake and the experience is dominated by the buzz of engines, surge of boat waves, and smell of gasoline.

It is even more critical in our fast-paced life for us to escape the noise, speed and smell of roaring engines. It is good for all of us to have places for refuge and silence, places where we can observe native species and intact ecosystems and enjoy an overnight camping experience. Such wild places grow fewer each year.

It’s important that people have accessible wilderness areas. The Adirondack Park offers great opportunities for hiking in wild places, where the longer one hikes the more remote the country one can access, but opportunities to do this by boat are limited. For many, canoe or kayak access is how they get to wild places and enjoy Wilderness. Greater opportunities are needed for this type of experience in the Adirondack Park.

Older People and People with Limited Physical Mobility Deserve Easily Accessible Motor-free Waters

Often the criticism of a motor-free lake is that it discriminates against people with limited mobility. But there are many older people and people with limited mobility who desire to have wild experiences on a motor-free water body. They cannot hike great distance, but they can paddle or ride in a canoe. The vast majority of motor-free opportunities are on small, remote lakes and ponds, which are challenging to reach for older people or people with limited mobility. Easily accessible motor-free waters should be available for these people.  Motor-free waters provide a wide range of opportunities for elderly and disabled individuals and groups.

Forever Wild and the State Constitution

In 1894, the framers of the “Forever Wild” clause in the State Constitution recognized the need for public opportunities for a close connection to nature. A big part of the leading testimony in support of the “Forever Wild” clause was to provide lands and waters where, in their language, “peace and quiet” would reign forever and the sounds, smells and life of nature would be an unbroken chain from that time onward. Nothing is more faithful for the spirit of “Forever Wild” than a motor-free lake or pond.

Opportunities for New Motor-free Waters in APA Forest Preserve Classification Review

In the spring of 2013, the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) started its formal classification review for the new Forest Preserve lands around the Essex Chain Lakes. The Department of Environmental Conservation made its formal submission to the APA. The APA will conduct a formal public hearing process during the summer-fall of 2013. Part of the Essex Chain Lakes and one of the 200 largest lakes and ponds in the Adirondack Park is Third Lake (Minerva, Essex County).

Public use will be determined during the APA’s classification hearings. PROTECT supports a Wilderness classification for the Essex Chain Lakes. This provides an opportunity to increase the number of motor-free lakes among the biggest 100 lakes and ponds in the Adirondack Park from 8 to 9. Boreas Pond is scheduled to be purchased by the state within the next five years. This waterbody is another ideal candidate for motor-free management through a Wilderness classification. If Boreas Pond is classified as Wilderness and managed as a motor-free waterbody it would bring the number of motor-free lakes among the biggest 100 lakes in the Adirondacks to 10 lakes.

In the Adirondack Park’s Forest Preserve, lands designated Wild Forest include over 100,000 more acres than lands designated Wilderness. Wilderness lands should be equal to Wild Forest. For all the reasons detailed in this report there needs to be many more opportunities for easily accessible motor-free waters in the Adirondack Park for the public to enjoy.

Today, just five of the biggest 100 lakes in the Adirondacks are relatively easy to access and motor-free. Just 17 of the biggest 200 lakes are easily accessible and motor-free. The demand is high for motor-free experiences, but the supply is low.  This needs to change.

The public deserves greater opportunities for motor-free waters across the Adirondack Park.

Photo: Loon Lake, one of many Adirondack lakes dominated by motorboat and jet ski traffic (courtesy Shannon Houlihan).

• Share on Tumblr

Related Stories

Peter Bauer

Peter Bauer is the Executive Director of Protect the Adirondacks . He has been working in various capacities on Adirondack Park environmental issues since the mid-1980s, including stints as the Executive Director of the Residents' Committee to Protect the Adirondacks and FUND for Lake George as well as on the staff of the Commission on the Adirondacks in the Twenty-First Century. He was the co-founder of the Adirondack Lake Assessment Program (ALAP) in 1998, which has collected long-term water quality data on more than 75 Adirondack lakes and ponds. He has testified before the State Legislature, successfully advocated to pass legislation and budget items, authored numerous articles, op-eds, and reports such as "20% in 2023: An Assessment of the New York State 30 by 30 Act" (2023), "The Adirondack Park and Rural America: Economic and Population Trends 1970-2010" (2019), "The Myth of Quiet, Motor-free Waters in the Adirondack Park" (2013), and "Rutted and Ruined: ATV Damage on the Adirondack Forest Preserve" (2003) and "Growth in the Adirondack Park: Analysis of Rates and Patterns of Development" (2001). He also worked at Adirondack Life Magazine . He served as Chair of the Town of Lake George Zoning Board of Appeals and has served on numerous advisory boards for management of the Adirondack Park and Forest Preserve. Peter lives in Blue Mountain Lake with his wife, has two grown children out in the world, and enjoys a wide variety of outdoor recreational activities throughout the Adirondacks, and is a member of the Blue Mountain Lake volunteer fire department.Follow Protect the Adirondacks on Facebook and Threads .

37 Responses

“Lows Lake, Little Tupper Lake, Round Lake, Lake Lila, and St. Regis Pond”

What about Little Clear Pond (drive to), Green Pond (drive to), Long Pond (very short carry)…..

Your argument here seems to be centered on a lack of “large” ponds or lakes is that correct?

All the smaller ponds (and some pretty large) that are not accessible by anyone except paddlers are by default motor-less waters, no?

Would you also envision waters that are ONLY for motorized use as well as part of this balance?

^^^ TROLL ^^^

Troll alert says, ^^^TROLL^^^Couldn’t agree more.

I would scratch Lows lake from the truly motorless list. During my first experience there in July a couple years back I saw a pontoon boat docked up at the boy scout camp/landing and a fishing boat with trolling motor in that same area. Add to that the drone of a generator from the camp (which was much worse than motors when you have to listen to it all night), and you have a wilderness experience let down. I did return with a better experience, but that couldn’t have been an isolated experience.

But are the larger water bodies good for cartop boats? Realistically, a lake the size Piseco Lake or Lake Placid is going to be choppy and rough and most days, for a small car-top boat.

Those lakes are best reserved primarily for bigger boats, but if people want to take cartop boats out on them, then they should stay close to the shore, and in smaller bays.

Also, most of the large lakes are highly developed along the shore, and have one or more major highways along them. Banning motor boats would have a minimal effect compared the noise pollution along the shorelines.

Also, many of the larger lakes. The Saranac chain, Cranberry, Rainbow etc. have many acres of water that is only accessible by paddlers since much of these dammed up waterways are too shallow for most motor boats. I have had lots of quiet paddling in the coves and bays of many of the larger lakes.

I’ve paddled both Piseco and Lake Placid several dozen times, in a 10 foot 14lb canoe, and have never encountered conditions that were too choppy or rough. In fact, the only time I’ve felt unsafe in a small boat on lakes like that is when a motor boats wake hit me.

It is a good point, however, that some of these larger lakes are developed to the point where quiet paddling is hard to come by regardless of the motors on the lake. Not all of them however. Lake Placid for example is a lake that can offer lots of quiet solitude when the motor boats are not going at it, even with the shoreline development.

According to the study 3 of 8 of the top 100, and 12 of 29 of the top 200 motor-less lakes are dubbed “remote and non accessible”. Peter, two things. First why not advocate to make them more accessible and second doesn’t your group normally advocate for things like Wilderness designations and road closures that make things remote and inaccessible? Seems like you want to have it both ways. Make many places inaccessible and then restrict the accessible ones to your groups preferred activity?

On the demand side you say this: “There is a great demand for recreational experiences on accessible, motor-free lakes and ponds. The demand is high, but the supply is low.”

I saw no data to support anything on the demand side in your report. I don’t see places like the St. Regis Canoe area especially crowded at most times? I do see boat launches like the Second Pond launch for Lower Saranac jammed and overflowing onto the highway all summer long.

I think it is probably a good idea to increase some motor-less opportunities but I don’t see any big “myths” involved. I would also add that the campaign to “clarify” navigation rights on streams and rivers as somewhat of an invitation to motorized use of some water bodies that have historically been pretty quiet places to paddle.

Paul, the ponds you mention are accessible and motor-free but they are not among the largest lakes in the Park.

That is true. I guess Peter is referring to the St. Regis Lakes rather than St. Regis Pond in his comments. I was thinking that Little Clear and Long Pond as examples are pretty large bodies of water for paddling. It took me a while to row the length of Little Clear the other day and St. Regis was windy and about as large as a “lake” I would have wanted to be on in a guide boat that day.

This is a topic where I think some groups have backed themselves into a bit of a corner. First there is what I have mentioned above about wanting to have the access issue both ways and then there is another issue. Phil in something you wrote the other day on the Finch property classification there was this idea that a new canoe area in there could help relieve some of the pressure on the St. Regis Canoe area? All along some have been arguing that these things will increase tourism business for the local communities. Now we see the argument that one area will draw “business” away from other areas. I don’t think this is what many local politicians had in mind when they approved these deals. So if the demand is really there and motor-less will be more of a draw than something else than fine but a better case must be made.

What are the stats? How many motor boats versus motor-less crafts? Is there a numbers case to be made for more of a “balance”.

Paul, I don’t have the stats. But I see a lot more cars in the Park carrying canoes and kayaks than pulling motorboats.

I see a lot of canoes and kayaks also. It would be interesting to see what the data is and what the majority of paddlers really want. I seem to see lots of paddlers that don’t seem to have any issue with using waterways that are a mix of boat types. The theoretical question is would a launch like Second Pond have more paddlers there if it were not totally jammed with trailers all summer. I am just not sure there is really an issue here. A lake like upper St. Regis is great for paddling even with the motor boats that are there.

Here is a simple economic question that would not be hard to get at. What is the economic impact of the marinas in the Adirondacks verses the outfitters. You could start around the trilakes. I know that one Ski Nautique sold is the equivalent of about 50 one thousand dollar canoes as far as sales tax revenue goes. How many boats does St. Regis sell in an entire season? We need to have both kinds of activities but does the latter justify some type of balance as far as the water ways they need exclusive use of?

Need a better research method I think. Even if you took a couple days a year diligently counting boats on a road or launch does not capture the whole picture. Seeing more canoes and kayaks does not account for the motor boats docked long term or sitting in trailers in driveways. They are less mobile and many people keep their motor boats on a lake longer-term. If reducing motorboats is the goal, then the best way to do it is not through just access regulations, but increased ownership costs. Use research to support environmental impact and cost to compensate/clean up the damage by motor boats and come up with additional boat registration fees.Add in a pump surcharge at marinas and that would definitely cut down on the motor boat numbers. Also, a bit off point but related, What about a blue line permit for added accountability for all water craft to cut down on invasives to start a war chest to combat them?

Matt, I don’t think there is any goal to reduce the number of motorboats? If you did want to do it then you could just close the public launches. The development of the four cycle engine and very strict emissions standards has really changed the way motorboats impact the environment. I suspect that electric boats (I should say more types since there are some already) will also continue that trend. Would this thing be legal on a “motor-less” lake?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzfYAeXTOUk

Over the past few years I’ve wanted to take my kids summer camping on a motorless lake with clean water and wild, as opposed to recently logged shores or shores heavily impacted by dam releases. Lake Lila fits the bill, but each time we’ve gone in, after driving a great distance, the parking lot has been completely full – even on weekdays. So off we usually end up at the Saranacs. In spite of trying, my kids have never canoe camped on a quiet lake, and we go almost every year.

I have been camping and canoeing in the Adirondacks for over 50 years, and I can tell you it is a fact that there is huge demand for quality, quiet water here in the greatest park in the East. For those who see dollar signs, if we capitalize on paddlesports, the Adirondacks could one day regain its rightful place as the greatest watersports park in the nation. It’s a good dream.

Dan, Why not try the St. Regis Canoe area. There are many different places where you can set off and you won’t find any dams or logged shorelines. It sounds like the Essex Chain lakes will also be open soon. Hopefully it will not be too difficult to access.

This does not really bother me. Many of the largest lakes aren’t great for paddling anyways. The best paddling spots will always be in the small, secluded and hard to reach areas where solitude can be found.

If I am putting in on Lake George for example, I know that I will likely deal with higher winds and choppier waters in addition to boat traffic. And just because a lake allows motorboats does not mean that the lake is overrun with them. I have always enjoyed paddling Blue Mountain Lake. There is motorboat traffic, but not much of it, and the scenery is great. Nothing but great experiences there.

Also, many of the large lakes will have areas of low boat traffic (EX – Northwest Bay, Lake George).

Generally, I see three or four canoes, kayaks and row boats to one motor boat. Of the camps on the lakes, most have one motor boat but often two or three cnaoes or kayaks. This is anecdotal though, with the numbers picked up over about 30 years of paddling/hiking through the ADK’s.

Racquette Lake is a good example of mixed traffic on the water. Sometimes, I have to stick closer to shore as the larger waves roll off my boat. Othertimes I can paddle anywhere. Crossing Lake Champlain with a small 12′ canoyak is an experience. You wonder sometimes if the motor boats are even watching. Yes, both types can coexist on the water. But smaller water is, perhaps, exclusivly “owned” by small, human powered boats.

To have 5% of the largest lakes reserved for human powered boats is reasonable in my estimation. There are many, many canoers, kayakes and rowers out there that would love a pleasent day on the water without worrying about a motor boat suddenly racing by. Yes, it’s slower, like the pace of life in these areas. 5% is a drop in the bucket to paddle a pristine lake, a price I would easily pay.

Even though a beer and tooling along in front of a motor can be enjoyable at times, you simply do not see too many animals with the engine running. How many times have you seen a couple deer amble down for a drink and walk back? Not in a motor boat. By the same token, getting from point A to point B is easier done with a motor.

I agree with the sentiments expressed in the article. I believe that there are a LOT of people that would slow down, smell the roses (avoiding the bee) and simply kick back and watch the sunset on a larger lake, IF they had a chance to paddle out on one. At least night navigation would not be an exercise in risk taking, but a serene moon light paddle on glass smooth water.

This conversation and Peter’s reasonable proposition reminds me of the time an intrepid person suggested that hikers should have to pay for a permit to climb the high peaks, indeed any peak in the ADKs — the person was lucky to get out of the room intact. I am a paddler (also own a guideboat) and have experienced too many instances of thoughtless owners of motorboats leaving wakes that endangered me and my cohort, even close to shore. I support Mr. Bauer’s position that the region needs more “motorless” bodies of water that are easily accessible. For those who argue motorboaters bring more $$$ to the local economy, take in the annual Wooden Canoe Heritage Association Annual get together at Paul Smith’s College in June. Paddlers are not noticed as much ‘cuz they make a lot less noise !!

Don’t get me started on this…

I paddle and row and have a motorboat. This thing about “thoughtlessness” goes both ways. It is almost a several a day experience on the Sarnac Chain in a motorboat to have many canoes and kayaks paddling on the wrong side of the navigation channel (going the wrong way) or across the navigation channel for no reason completely clueless to where they should be. And this in places where they could be far outside the channel enjoying a much more quiet part of the lake or river. It makes almost no sense.

BB, I agree there should probably be some more “motor-less” opportunities but the smaller more remote waterways seem much more suitable for paddlers. Don’t forget all the rivers and streams that are pretty much only “open” for paddlers as well. It just isn’t a”myth” that there are many places out there like Peter claims.

Navigation channels are for motor boats not canoes. Your attitude reflects the typical “I drive, therefore I rule the road” attitude of car drivers, in this case transferred to the water.

Get rid of the motorized boats, no need for navigation channels…problem solved!

Didn’t say the motor boats rule the “road”. Some of them are just as clueless at times.

Roads are built primarily for motor vehicles. Bikes can use them as well but they must follow the rules of the road. Cars and bikes must share the road. Isn’t it the same in Navigation channels? Are most water bodies that have a navigation channel also considered public highways? Isn’t the right of navigation a common law right?

Roads were built for motor vehicles and lakes were built by glaciers. Navigation channels were laid out to delineate a safe passage for motor boats to not damage their props. I know of no statute that requires non-motorized boats (or motorized for that matter) to follow a navigation channel. I also know of no navigation channel with a center stripe, white shoulder lines, crosswalks (crosspaddles?), or non-motorized shoulders that would imply a designated area for certain craft to stay in. Are you saying that I should get a ticket for encroaching in the ‘wrong’ part of a navigation channel with a canoe?

No. I think maybe we are suggesting that there are common sense “rules” that apply to traveling on any kind of road, path, hiking trail,river, or lake, whatever. And some folks are certainly free to not use their common sense. There is no shortage of that one some waterways.

I like motor-free lakes because as a paddler, they are quieter, safer, and for me, more in harmony with my idea of experiencing nature.

My canoe does not disturb the motor boat. The motor boat disturbs my canoe.

While I support more motor-free waters, it must be said that there are wilderness areas in the Park today that are loaded with motorless lakes and ponds, which are used by virtually no one.

In terms of policy, we could approach the issue of motor vs. no motor cooperatively:

How about one motor free day per week on some lakes?

One all-electric day?

This is not just about boating.

My family loves to swim long distances, and we choose to do this only in motor-free lakes.

I prefer to read next to a motor-free lake.

Follensby Clear Pond is among the bodies of water that ought to be motor-free. Anyone with a motorized water craft has easy access to Upper Saranac Lake a stone’s throw away. They don’t need Follensby Clear. I would certainly consider camping there if it were motor-free. I also agree with Bauer’s point that there are older folks who like to paddle in a serene setting but are not able to portage. They deserve easy access to some quiet water paddling.

Tom, Isn’t Follensby Clear Pond already a “motor-free” pond?

“I also agree with Bauer’s point that there are older folks who like to paddle in a serene setting but are not able to portage. They deserve easy access to some quiet water paddling.”

Then you should ask his group to support policies that will keep more waterways easily accessible. There are a number of motor-less waters that, if made more accessible, could solve this dilemma.

Follensby Clear is not motor free. Neither are a lot of the little bodies of water around there. One of which, I own property on and can attest to this.

We already have hundreds of lakes and ponds with direct accessibility. No need to support opening access to others if you want motor free paddling. Seems easier to more fairly distribute motor usage on those hundreds of lakes and ponds that are already accessible.

Dave, thanks for the info on Follensby Clear.

“We already have hundreds of lakes and ponds with direct accessibility. No need to support opening access to others if you want motor free paddling.”

According to Peter’s post here that is a myth???

I don’t see where Peter suggests that is a myth at all.

There are hundreds of lakes that are easily accessible in the Adirondacks, the overwhelming majority of them just happen to allow motors.

What I am saying is that if we want people to have motor free usage of accessible lakes and ponds, there is no reason to build roads or ease access to MORE lakes and ponds, all we need to do is declare some of the ones already accessible as motor free.

You could do it that way but don’t you think it would be fairer for both constituents to just make some of the hundreds of motor free waters that you are describing more accessible rather than kicking motors off waters that are already open for that use?

There are many examples where you simply need to remove a gate. For example removing the gate and eliminating the carry down the road to Lake Lila would make exactly the type of lake that Peter describes more accessible for motor free use for the type of users he is concerned cannot gain access?

This is an interesting site and soon my wife and I will spend a week in the Adirondacks for the first time ( we’re native New Englanders).

It would be great to have a greater number of waters that are motor free but I am afraid it is too late. As a child I grew up on a large freshwater lake in Massachusetts and it was great but that changed over the years. Boats got bigger and more powerful. Technically the speedlimit was 45 but one police officer in town had a boat that could reach 83mph. I think that statement pretty much sums it all up.

The lake I grew up on was the scene of canoes, rowboats and nothing bigger than 10 or 20 horsepower. That changed because the town saw money from visiting water skiers as well as recently the site of some bass tournaments with boats that have 200 plus horsepower.

Sadly rules should have been in place twenty years ago. There are some but few restricted lakes in New England I am not sure if it will happen in the future because the almighty dollar still rules. I am not sure about New York state and the towns in the Adirondacks but I suspect they welcome the boats because these see a trail of money.

Again, I believe it may be too late. It should have been done thirty or more years ago.I could be worng.

For what it’s worth, I have seen very little mention or consideration extended in Peter’s original piece to the many property Adirondack property owners who happen to have camps on many of these larger non-motorless lakes

Believe it or not, there are still many camps that require use motorized acess. And on many of the lakes, the owners also own and use sailboats, guideboats and yes, even canoes.

It is about time we recognize that motorless advocates are not exclusively paddlers. Should the non-motorized community have more rights than the camp and property owners, who contribute to the local economy via land and school taxes. employmentl for locals, and a thousand other ways,

Is it fair for paddlers to claim exclusive rights to traditional waters where sportsmen and anglers have traditionally used motors to access remote areas to hunt and fish, and dare I mention ‘check their traps’.

In terms of simple economics, it would be interesting to compare the contributions of each user group, as well as in terms of environmental protection. I’m sure that property owners are much more contientious when it comes to matters of invasives, noise pollution, and common courtesy for other users.

I paddle and row, and also use a motor on occassion. And as previously mentioned , I have also encountered inconsiderate packs of paddlers on the channel between the Saranac Lakes. Likewise, I have been swamped more than once by inconsiderate motor boaters while pulling on the oars of a guideboat along the same route.

Unfortunately, it remains impossible for the state to legislate, zone or designate the use of common sense or common courtesy. In the effort to exclude one type of access over another, someone is going to be discriminated against. Who has the right to make this call? I see both sides of the coin, as I frequently haul a pack canoe down Cranberry Lake a motorboat to enjoy the motorless waters of the Five Ponds Wilderness. It is often too dangerous to make the long trip across the big lake with just the canoe. All users must learn to share, and calling for exclusivity is not good manners in the sandbox or on the water.

Having paddled in the Adirondacks for years, I can tell you that many of the larger bodies of waters are not safe to paddlers. Only Sat, I was at the Otis Reservoir in Otis , MA it was a DISASTER. Jerk-offs on Jet ski’s , PWC, large boats all speeding up and down a 1,200 acres body of water ? Huge wakes- YES even along the shore. No consideration at all. Loud, huge wakes As long as the boaters have their fun , F everybody else is the rule.

Latest News Headlines

• Glimpses of the past and present at Rattlesnake Knob
• Bear family death sparks outrage in Old Forge
• State to invest $8.5M into Adirondack airport updates
• A new climate institute brings NYC students to the ADKs
• Route 66, in miniature: The story behind an Adirondack landmark
• Empty beds in Adirondack hotels: The downside of tourism projects
• How Ticonderoga is addressing a childcare shortage
• Run-down real estate set for reuse in two Adirondack centers
• President Quezon Day brings Filipino heritage to the Tri-Lakes
• Hundreds rally to save Adirondack-area prison

Recent Almanack Comments

• Nancy Keet on Loons Banded Ahead of Hurricane Debby
• Nancy Brandt on Loons Banded Ahead of Hurricane Debby
• fran belge on Town of Webb Tourism Director details events leading up to bear family death
• William Flagg on Loons Banded Ahead of Hurricane Debby
• Jim Hofschneider on Town of Webb Tourism Director details events leading up to bear family death

The Adirondack Almanack

The Adirondack Almanack is a public forum dedicated to promoting and discussing current events, history, arts, nature and outdoor recreation and other topics of interest to the Adirondacks and its communities

We publish commentary and opinion pieces from voluntary contributors, as well as news updates and event notices from area organizations. Contributors include veteran local writers, historians, naturalists, and outdoor enthusiasts from around the Adirondack region. The information, views and opinions expressed by these various authors are not necessarily those of the Adirondack Almanack or its publisher, the Adirondack Explorer.

• Commenting Policy
• Advertise on the Adirondack Almanack

• Recent Topics
• NorthWest Kayak Anglers »
• Forum »
• Regional Discussions »
• Washington Kayak Fishing »
• Suggestions for small, no-gas-motor lakes in western WA?

• © 2006-2016 NorthWestKayakAnglers.com SMF 2.0.14 | SMF © 2017 , Simple Machines Simple Audio Video Embedder TinyPortal © 2005-2012 SMFAds for Free Forums

Northwest Fishing Reports

A free forum for the discussion of fishing the Inland Northwest.

Skip to content

• Unanswered topics
• Active topics
• Back to NWFR Forum Home Forum Discussion Boat and Boating Topics

No motorized boats allowed...does this also mean electric

Post by dea » Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:58 pm

RE:No motorized boats allowed...does this also mean electric

Post by Anglinarcher » Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:13 am

dea wrote: I was curious if the rule, "no motorized boats" included electric motors.

Post by G-Man » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:29 am

Post by dea » Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:43 pm

Post by Marc Martyn » Thu Apr 07, 2011 2:11 am

Post by G-Man » Thu Apr 07, 2011 3:30 am

Post by Mike Smith » Tue May 10, 2011 10:33 am

Post by MarkFromSea » Tue May 10, 2011 1:36 pm

Post by 8Fish_box » Tue May 10, 2011 2:06 pm

Post by Marc Martyn » Tue May 10, 2011 11:18 pm

8Fish_box wrote: Most times no motor allowed means combustion motors. Electrics dont put out any polution.

Post by geljockey » Wed May 11, 2011 10:15 pm

Marc Martyn wrote: In several instances, this is not clear because the state says one thing and the county says another. Fish Lake by Cheney states in the WDFW regs that "no internal combustion motors allowed." However, Spokane County owns the property that Fish Lake sits on. In the park regulations, it clearly states "No motorized boats allowed". Now the question rises, do they enforce the rule? For all the time that Spokane County has had control of Fish Lake, there has been no enforcement of the no motors rule. I have seen dozens of boats trolling with electric motors on the lake for the last 15-20 years. It all boils down to who owns the body of water. In the case of Fish Lake, the game department will enforce the rules they have posted in their regulations. The county parks will enforce the rules they have for the park. Both are conflicting. A couple of years ago, Medical Lake was listed in the WDFW regulations as "Electric motors only". The town of Medical Lake owns the lake and had a sign at the launch saying "No motors allowed". Someone finally convinced the WDFW to change their rules for Medical Lake to read "no motors allowed", therefore following the rules of the City Of Medical Lake. It appears to me that the owner of the lake has the final word, not the WDFW.

Post by Marc Martyn » Wed May 11, 2011 10:29 pm

geljockey wrote: Marc Martyn wrote: In several instances, this is not clear because the state says one thing and the county says another. Fish Lake by Cheney states in the WDFW regs that "no internal combustion motors allowed." However, Spokane County owns the property that Fish Lake sits on. In the park regulations, it clearly states "No motorized boats allowed". Now the question rises, do they enforce the rule? For all the time that Spokane County has had control of Fish Lake, there has been no enforcement of the no motors rule. I have seen dozens of boats trolling with electric motors on the lake for the last 15-20 years. It all boils down to who owns the body of water. In the case of Fish Lake, the game department will enforce the rules they have posted in their regulations. The county parks will enforce the rules they have for the park. Both are conflicting. A couple of years ago, Medical Lake was listed in the WDFW regulations as "Electric motors only". The town of Medical Lake owns the lake and had a sign at the launch saying "No motors allowed". Someone finally convinced the WDFW to change their rules for Medical Lake to read "no motors allowed", therefore following the rules of the City Of Medical Lake. It appears to me that the owner of the lake has the final word, not the WDFW.

Post by geljockey » Thu May 12, 2011 11:43 pm

Marc Martyn wrote: geljockey wrote: Marc Martyn wrote: In several instances, this is not clear because the state says one thing and the county says another. Fish Lake by Cheney states in the WDFW regs that "no internal combustion motors allowed." However, Spokane County owns the property that Fish Lake sits on. In the park regulations, it clearly states "No motorized boats allowed". Now the question rises, do they enforce the rule? For all the time that Spokane County has had control of Fish Lake, there has been no enforcement of the no motors rule. I have seen dozens of boats trolling with electric motors on the lake for the last 15-20 years. It all boils down to who owns the body of water. In the case of Fish Lake, the game department will enforce the rules they have posted in their regulations. The county parks will enforce the rules they have for the park. Both are conflicting. A couple of years ago, Medical Lake was listed in the WDFW regulations as "Electric motors only". The town of Medical Lake owns the lake and had a sign at the launch saying "No motors allowed". Someone finally convinced the WDFW to change their rules for Medical Lake to read "no motors allowed", therefore following the rules of the City Of Medical Lake. It appears to me that the owner of the lake has the final word, not the WDFW.

Post by Marc Martyn » Fri May 13, 2011 12:57 am

Post by The Quadfather » Fri May 13, 2011 1:56 am

G-Man wrote: Marc, I see the WDFW motor rules as being applicable just to the time you are fishing and not meant to override local regulations. Hence the inclusion of the word "fishing" to the definitions provided in the pamphlet.

Post by Stacie Kelsey » Fri May 13, 2011 3:00 am

Return to “Boat and Boating Topics”

• Northwest Fishing Report Products
• ↳   Northwest Fishing Reports Items For Sale
• Forum Discussion
• ↳   Announcements and Fishing/Club Notices
• ↳   Website Requests
• ↳   Classifieds
• ↳   Boat and Boating Topics
• ↳   Culinary Delights - Fish Recipes
• ↳   The Vise - Fly Patterns, Tying, Swap Events
• ↳   Hardware How-to's and Swap Event
• ↳   Collectible fishing tackle
• ↳   Camping Life - the BEST places to go (and avoid!)
• ↳   NWFR TV and Video Section
• Fishing Discussions
• ↳   Lake Fishing
• ↳   The Pacific NW Fish ID Corner
• ↳   Saltwater Fishing
• ↳   Secret Lake
• ↳   Bass Fishing
• ↳   Fly Fishing
• ↳   Walleye and Panfish Sponsored By Mar Don Resort
• ↳   Ice Fishing!
• ↳   River Fishing
• ↳   Muskie Fishing
• ↳   Trout and Kokanee Fishing
• ↳   Alpine Lakes - Hikes and Destinations
• ↳   Here Pikey Pikey...
• ↳   Beyond the Northwest
• ↳   Quick Search for a Fishing Buddy
• ↳   Fishing with Disabilities
• Oregon Fishing
• ↳   Pete Heley Outdoors
• ↳   Oregon Lakes Fishing Discussions
• ↳   Oregon Saltwater Fishing Discussions
• ↳   Oregon Rivers Fishing Discussions
• Non-Fishing Discussions/Technical Support
• ↳   Bugs & Problems, Moderator Support
• ↳   Membership Help and FAQ
• ↳   Products & Gear
• ↳   Off Topic
• ↳   Hunting Topics - Sponsored By Mar Don Resort Duck Taxi
• ↳   Shellfishing/Squid/Crayfish

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 206 guests

• Back to NWFR Forum Home
• All times are UTC+01:00

Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy | Terms

• Freshwater Fishing

Where are the best 9.9hp restricted lakes?

• Thread starter BigBubbaBass
• Start date Sep 6, 2014
• Sep 6, 2014

BigBubbaBass

Senior Member

Welcome back Bubba, good we can get your boat muddy next time! lol Well besides "the Rock" ya got Fort Yargo in Winder. I would suggest getting a stand to take the gas motor off from time to time. That would open up your options for electric only. But 16' with a 9.9, would do well in the backs of the creeks on lakes as big as Lanier, or even Oconee and Sinclair. You just need to learn when to avoid the big lakes.  

I am also looking for electric lakes. The guy I bought it from used it on West Point and on rivers but I do not know anything about fishing rivers and West Point is too far. Any electric lakes you would recommend?  

kevincarden

High Falls lake. Kinda SE of Griffin off I-75. Big Bass and Hybrid  

• Sep 7, 2014

Ditto on High Falls.  

Any others?  

Fishin & Hunting

Juliet, the Georgia Power Lake, 25 hp restriction.  

• Sep 9, 2014

Here's a list of the more popular electric / small lakes around metro Atlanta. EO = electric only. No gas motor mounted on boat. Stone Mountain Lake. (Inside SM park 9.9hp gas) Ft Yargo (Near Winder off SR316 or I-85. 9.9 hp gas) Cedar Creek Res (Off I-985 Gainesville, exit 24 EO) Lake Varner (Near Covington. Also known as Cornish Creek reservoir. EO) Black Shoals. (Rockdale county off SR20 EO.) Bear Creek. (North of Winder. SR 330 EO) Lake Horton (Fayetteville area EO) JW Smith (Hampton. EO. Closed during winter) Hard Labor Creek State Park. (Near Soc Cir/Rutledge) Charlie Elliot WMA. (3 lakes w/ramps WMA lic req'd. EO) Lake Lathem (Cherokee Cty off Ga400 EO) High Falls Lake (Off I-75 exit# 198 Jackson Ga. 9.9 hp) These are all public accessable lakes. Some Atlanta metro counties have county resident only lakes and none of these are on this list. No shortage of water to fish but like any new water, you're gonna have to put in some time to develop patterns and confidence spots. Stn Mtn yielded 4 sacks over 20 lbs in ONE tourney this year with Big String over 24 lbs. Not bad fishing for a 350 acre lake 15 mins from downtown Atlanta.  

• Sep 10, 2014

Great post Mr P  

Mr. P said: Here's a list of the more popular electric / small lakes around metro Atlanta. EO = electric only. No gas motor mounted on boat. Charlie Elliot WMA. (3 lakes w/ramps WMA lic req'd. EO) These are all public accessable lakes. Some Atlanta metro counties have county resident only lakes and none of these are on this list. No shortage of water to fish but like any new water, you're gonna have to put in some time to develop patterns and confidence spots. Stn Mtn yielded 4 sacks over 20 lbs in ONE tourney this year with Big String over 24 lbs. Not bad fishing for a 350 acre lake 15 mins from downtown Atlanta. Click to expand...

Google "Small Georgia lakes open for fishing". You will see where to go -its a great GA DNR based webpage showing a bunch of choices -I have been using the site for over 15 years now, and have found many good & not so good ponds/lakes. It will list contact info for each as well as the rules, fee's, etc. Good luck.  

needmotime2fish

Two more EO lakes: (1) Tribble Mill (Gwinnett Co.); (2) Commerce Watershed lake (not far from the dragstrip behind the outlet mall in Commerce).  

• Dec 5, 2014

How is Juliette this time of year? I have never been and trying to decide where to go on Sunday.... Varner and Juliette are the 2 I am trying to decide between unless there is somewhere that would be better this time of year???  

The Longhunter

Lake Chapman (Sandy Creek Park) Athens Clarke County, EO.  

• Dec 6, 2014

Cricket Chunker

One more thought is a lot of the EO lakes will let you use a boat with a gas motor "attached" as long as you only use the trolling motor. But some are pure EO with no gas motors allowed in the gate. Usually this info for a specific lake can be found in a google search or by a quick phone call to the agency who operates the lake. So just because it's an EO lake, does not mean you always have to take the gas motor off the boat to fish there.  

• Dec 7, 2014

WOODSWIZE said: Google "Small Georgia lakes open for fishing". You will see where to go -its a great GA DNR based webpage showing a bunch of choices -I have been using the site for over 15 years now, and have found many good & not so good ponds/lakes. It will list contact info for each as well as the rules, fee's, etc. Good luck. Click to expand...

• Dec 8, 2014

Bear Creek is closed for the winter. Lucas used to shut down also.  

DAWG1419 said: Bear Creek is closed for the winter. Click to expand...

• Dec 9, 2014

The Bear Creek boat ramp is CLOSED from Dec 1st thru Feb 28th. It reopens March 1st. They started this last year and it continues on. The web site implies that the bank fishing area is open year round as well as homeowner access for the houses that have access to the lake front. JW Smith is open March thru October and is closed Thurs and Fridays. Lake Lucas has many "closed dates" Like July and August for example as well as some holidays. It closes from around Nov 1st thru March 1st. It is only open 3 days a week also. Best to check their web site before taking a trip down there.  

MOST EO lakes don't allow motors to be on the boat. Horton allows a motor if it is "up and OUT of the water." Yargo allows up to 9.9 but you can use a big bass boat motor to put the boat on and off the trailer only. Stone Mountain allows up to 9.9. If motor is larger than 9.9 you must REMOVE the prop and the prop cannot be stored on the boat. Varner, Black Shoals, JW Smith, Cedar Creek do not allow any combustion motors to be on the lake. Best advice was given before to check the web site for the various lakes to be sure of the rules regarding gas motors on EO lakes. If you have a jon boat with a 9.9 or smaller they aren't that much trouble to remove. If you have a bass boat and want to fish these small lakes using your trolling motor you'll have a problem on many of the lakes.  

Similar threads

• Feb 24, 2024

• Jul 12, 2023

• Nov 16, 2023

• doomtrpr_z71
• May 27, 2024
• Saltwater Fishing

• BassinBraves
• Jan 2, 2022

Latest posts

• Latest: notnksnemor
• 2 minutes ago

• Latest: Mars

• Latest: BamaGeorgialine
• 3 minutes ago
• Latest: pete56
• 8 minutes ago
• Latest: BigBass123
• 10 minutes ago

Share this page

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• IFish Community
• Life in General

Non Motorized Lakes in Oregon for Kayaking

• Add to quote

I know of a few...Ollala, Clear Lake, Blue Lake...what are some of your other favoirte lakes/reservoirs to kayak or use float type tubes, that don't allow motorized boats?  

South Twin and Hosmer are cool. Hosmer is scenic. South Twin is a good family lake.  

Trillium Lake, by far the best view of Mt. Hood in the spring on a clear day.  

Silverton Reservoir good launch and parking, quiet on weekdays, scenic, close  

Barney reservior.....  

i agree i was just there last 2 weekends ago(post some pics) don't forget about ollie lake  

I believe Waldo Lake went motorless this year.  

Thanks Everyone! Great Help!  

Sparks is great, I guess motors are still allowed? Not much skiing and PWCing going on usually. I like it because it's somewhat sheltered (flat water) and you can meander among the lava flows.  

Gold lake and Daly lake are 2 good choices.  

Aren't Smith & Bybee in North Portland defacto non-motorized due to no ramps? Due to it's shallowness, Sturgeon Lake on Sauvie Island has to be the largest motor-free lake in Oregon. McNary lakes out there are also popular for paddling.  

Paddlefish said: Well, technically, it's not designated a "no motors" lake but the half-mile hike, all uphill, tends to discourage most trailer sailors. I'll gladly carry one of my lighter canoes in, however, because it's a beautiful and peaceful spot. Well, unless you're there during a day-long thunderstorm. Talk about harmonics! Huckleberry season is good too. :wink: It's Boulder Lake, on the southeast slopes of Mount Hood. Reportedly 20 acres in size. Limited primitive camping, all with lake views. High cliffs around one side give it an amphitheater atmosphere. You can both see and hear the ospreys diving/crashing into the lake. Mostly brook trout, in my experience, and I was privileged to see a helicopter raining mini-brookies onto the lake once. Be forewarned, though. The youngest fishermen always seem to catch the biggest fish. Click to expand...

• ?            
• 84.5K members

Top Contributors this Month

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• General Discussions
• Questions about MI Hunting/Fishing Law

No Motor Lakes

• Add to quote

Does anyone know how lakes are designated as "NO Motor" lakes??? Is there anyway to un-designate them as such??? The lake in question is a private lake (no public access), if that makes a difference??? Thanks! Mark  

See my first post in this thread. http://www.michigan-sportsman.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=40444 I will tell you that it is harder to undo that to do in the first place. If there was a safety problem when it was passed before, I doubt that the safety problem has disappeared.  

• ?            
• 98K members

Top Contributors this Month